Showing posts with label windows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label windows. Show all posts

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Windows 7 “should do a lot better” than Vista

With the positive reaction to the Windows 7 beta coming from various places in the media, many have started to wonder how well Windows 7 will fare once it ships. While it’s still too early to know for sure, certain well-known groups have already made a point to voice their opinion about what will happen next. For example, a while back, I asked Michael Silver, Research VP of Gartner, how he expected to Windows 7 to perform compared to Windows Vista in both the consumer and business markets.

“It should do a lot better,” he told Ars. “Vista has such a bad reputation that it would be hard for Windows 7 not to do better, though Vista’s reputation is a lot worse than the product. Vista adoption is especially low in business—ISVs will eventually look to reduce or drop support for new applications on Windows XP and that will help push organizations to Windows 7 more quickly. Still it will take organizations 12-18 months from the time Windows 7 ships until they are ready to deploy it in large numbers, meaning broad adoption for enterprise begins in 1H11.”

Two weeks ago, Silver released a report titled Windows 7 Won’t Need SP1, but Will Still Need 12 to 18 Months Before Deployment Begins in which he dived deeper into what business users should expect. The most interesting conclusion he came to was “Don’t use SP1 as a milestone to deploy a new version of Windows, but plan to deploy SP1 as part of the initial deployment,” an obvious attempt to destroy the rule of thumb of “wait till SP1 for any new release of Windows.” That would have made Microsoft happy, but Silver still recommends waiting at least a year. Expect Redmond to be giving a completely different recommendation to businesses in the coming months.


Source: arstechnica

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Windows Live Messenger Error 80048821

SYMPTOMS
Windows Live Messenger could not sign you in because the sign-in name you entered does not exist or your password is incorrect. Error code: 80048823
SOLUTION
Before you start. Did you enter correct Username and Password?
1. The date on your computer needs to be set properly. Double click the clock verify that the time and date are set.
2. If your password information is not saved, verify that you are typing it in with the correct case (uppercase or lowercase).
3. Change your password at http://passport.com to something smaller (under 10-12 characters), then try signing in again.
4. If you use a firewall (like ZoneAlarm, Norton Internet Security etc.), it's possible that Messenger doesn't have the correct rights to access the Internet, especially since you upgraded. You may need to re/add Messenger to the allowed list of programs in your firewall if this is the case.
5. If you disabled your firewall in the past, it still may be blocking Messenger. Try restarting it and see if that helps the situation. You also might try uninstalling an installed firewall, to verify that it isn't causing a problem (even if it is disabled).
6. Clear your IE cache and cookies. Open Internet Explorer, click the Tools menu, then Internet Options, then click the Delete Files button, and when that's complete click the Delete Cookies button.
7. Check your IE Security settings. Open Internet Explorer, click the Tools menu, then Internet Options, then Advanced tab, scroll to the Security section, and verify that "Check for server certificate revocation" is unchecked. Also verify that 'Use SSL 2.0' and Use SSL 3.0' is checked, then click OK.
8. Click Start, then Run, and enter the following:
regsvr32 softpub.dll
then click OK
and do the same for the following:
regsvr32 wintrust.dll
regsvr32 initpki.dll
9. If using MSN Messenger 7, click the Tools menu, then Options, then Connection category, click the Advanced Settings button, uncheck all the options, click OK twice and then try again.

Tweak Windows Vista for Ultimate gaming

Windows Vista was heralded by its creators as being a speedy operating system. However, it didn’t take long for users to realise that Vista’s performance was generally no better than Windows XP, and in many cases was actually worse. Working with a PC that isn’t performing to its maximum potential can be a frustrating experience, but this is particularly true if the machine is used for gaming. But there are a huge number of tweaks that can be applied to help make working with Vista less exasperating.

Even if you’re working with a high spec rig, the chances are there’s s a great deal that can be done to help improve performance and reduce boot times.

Thankfully, increasing performance need not mean rushing out to the shops to spend hard earned cash on potentially expensive hardware upgrades – or even going so far as buying a whole new setup.

There are a huge number of settings built into Windows which can be adjusted to help speed things up. Some of these are fairly easy to locate – such as in the Control Panel – while others are secreted in hidden dialogs or require editing the registry. Although not every one of the individual tweaks covered here will provide a huge speed boost, used in combination with each other, the overall effect can be very impressive.

There’s no denying that working with Vista can sometimes be frustrating, but with a little time and effort it’s possible to regain control, banish some of the more wasteful features and earn yourself a faster computer into the bargain. Lets get tweaking!

Adjust file indexing

Vista’s file indexing sounds like a good idea in theory: maintaining an index of files contained on the hard drive along with details of their properties to help speed up searching. But in reality searching for files is something that most people do on a very infrequent basis, so it’s wasteful for Windows to spend any time monitoring files when that processor time could be put to much better use.

It’s worth tweaking the settings so that only relevant file types are indexed. Open the Indexing Options Control Panel and click the ‘Modify’ button to choose which folders should be included in the index. Click ‘OK’ followed by ‘Advanced’ and use the ‘File Types’ tab to select which file extensions should be included.

If the feature is not needed, head to the Programs and Features Control Panel and click the ‘Turn Windows features on. Untick the box labelled ‘Indexing Service’ and click ‘OK’ before restarting Windows. File indexing can also be disabled - more on that later.

Configure page file

Vista generally does a good job of maintaining the page file so it’s the optimum size, and it is a good idea to leave its size with automatic settings. However, if you have more than one hard drive, it’s advisable to move the page file so that it’s located on the fastest drive, and even if only one drive is available, moving it to a separate partition to Windows can help to improve system performance.

Go to Start, right-click ‘Computer’ and select ‘Properties’ before clicking the ‘Advanced system settings’ link to the left of the dialog. On the ‘Advanced’ tab, click the first of the three settings buttons and move to the ‘Advanced’ tab. Click the ‘Change’ button and untick the box labelled ‘Automatically manage paging file size for all drives’ before clicking ‘Set’. Select the entry for the C: drive and then select the ‘No paging file’ option. Now select another drive or partition from the list at the top of the dialog, select the ‘System managed size’ option and click ‘Set’ then ‘Okay’ it.

Most users understand the important of defragmenting hard drives to keep them performing optimally, but the standard defragmentation process does not touch the page file. One way to get around this is to temporarily disable the page file, run the standard defragmentation tool and then recreate the page file.

Cleanup startup

Programs which are configured to run automatically with Windows are something of a double-edged sword. While a program which starts with Windows is immediately available, or may help other apps to start more quickly when they are required, it can also increase boot times and reduce the amount of memory which is available to other programs.

The first place to look for possible candidates for deletion is the Startup group of the Start menu. Expand this submenu and simply right-click a shortcut before deleting it to prevent the associated program from starting the next time Windows boots. This method makes it possible to tame a number of startup programs, but it’s likely that there are many more hiding in the registry.

Launch the Registry Editor by pressing the Windows and R keys simultaneously, type ‘regedit’ and press Enter. Use the Explorer-style tree structure in the left hand pane to navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run’ and take a look through the list of programs displayed to the right. Take care not to jump in and delete everything that appears here as it is likely that at least a few of the entries are required – such as antivirus software.

Many programs can be easily identified from either their name or the entries path, but if anything is unclear search for the file name online to help determine what its purpose is and whether you can live without it. Now pay a visit to ‘HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run’ to see if there’s anything else that can be deleted.

Disable time stamps

Hard drives that have been formatted as NTFS partition perform better than their FAT 32 counterparts, but there are a couple of features of the format that can hinder performance slightly. Unless a much older operating system needs to access files on the Vista machine, there’s no need for Windows to create 8.3 file names for files.

In a similar vein, the time stamps which are added to files on an NTFA drive, whether they are accessed or not, are little more than a waste of resources for most people. Thankfully, both of these features can be disabled by editing the registry.

Launch the Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\ FileSystem. In the right-hand pane, double-click the key named ‘NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation’ and assign it a value of ‘1?. Do the same for ‘NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate’.

Uninstall remote differential compression

Remote Differential Compression is a feature used in network file synchronisation to help minimise the amount of data that needs to be transferred. It’s not generally a concern on a standard home network.

To uninstall this Vista feature, open the ‘Programs and Features’ Control Panel and click the ‘Turn Windows features on or off’ link. Untick the box next to the entry for Remote Differential Compression and then click ‘OK.’

Disable Aero and transparency effects

Right-click an empty section of the desktop and select ‘Personalize’ before clicking the ‘Theme’ link. By opting to use the old style Classic look of Windows, Aero is disabled helping to speed up general operations.

If you’d prefer to keep the Vista look, but disable Aero effects, click ‘Window Color and Appearance’ and untick the box labelled ‘Enable transparency’.

Boost SATA drive performance

To ensure that SATA hard drives are delivering the best possible performance, open the Device Manager by pressing the Windows and R keys simultaneously, then type ‘devmgmt. msc’ and press Enter.

In the list of hardware devices that’s displayed, double-click the ‘Disk drives’ entry to expand it and then double-click the listing for your hard drive. Move to the ‘Policies’ tab and you should see that ‘Enable write caching on the disk’ is selected by default. By ticking the box labelled ‘Enable advanced performance’, drive performance can be increased, but there’s an increased risk of data loss in the event of power failure.

If an external drive – such as a USB drive – is plugged in and is not removed, its performance can be improved by indicating that it will be permanently connected. After selecting the relevant drive from Device Manager, move to the Policies tab and ensure that the ‘Optimize for performance’ option is selected before clicking ‘OK’.

Disable system sounds

It may well seem insignificant, but if Windows plays a sound at startup or to accompany various events, valuable system resources are being wasted. Open the Sound Control Panel and move to the Sounds tab. From the drop down menu select ‘No Sounds’ and indicate whether the current sound scheme should be saved. Also untick the box labelled ‘Play Windows Startup sound’.

Other installed software, such as instant messaging tools, can feature sound effects, so it’s worth looking through the preferences of these programs to disable anything that’s not really needed.

Disable System Restore

System Restore is a useful feature of Windows. It is, however, also a hogger of resources and, providing an alternative manual backup method has been put in place, it can be safely disabled.

Open the System Control Panel and click the ‘System protection’ link to the left of the dialog. On the System Protection tab of System Properties, clear the tick boxes next to each of the listed drives, clicking ‘Turn Off System Restore’ having deselected the drive which contains Windows.

Use ReadyBoost

One of the most effective ways to help boost the performance of Windows is to add extra memory, and while this need not be expensive, there’s an even cheaper option available.

Vista’s ReadyBoost feature makes it possible to use a USB drive – either a thumb drive or a fully fledged external hard drive – to supplement any RAM which is already installed. Although this will not improve performance to the same extent as physical memory, most USB drives used for storage are rarely used to their full capacity and this free space may as well be put to good use.

Plug in a USB drive and an autoplay window should appear - select the option labelled ‘Speed up my computer’. If this dialog is not displayed simply open up Computer, right-click the relevant drive and select Properties before moving to the ‘ReadyBoost’ tab. Ensure that the ‘Use this device’ option is selected and use the slider to indicate how much of the disk storage space should be given offer to ReadyBoost.

Disable UAC

User Account Control has proved to be one of Vista’s least popular features by a long chalk. The handholding security warnings that get displayed when performing a range of common tasks serve only to irritate most computer users but the good news is that they can be banished in a variety of ways.

UAC can be disabled via the Control Panel, by editing the registry or by adjusting Group Policy settings, but the quickest and easiest option is to use MSConfig. Press the Windows + R keys , type ‘msconfig’ and press Enter. Move to the ‘Tools’ tab and select the entry labelled ‘Disable UAC’. Click the ‘Launch’ button and a Command Prompt window will appear – simply close this down when the operation is complete and then restart Windows to save the new setting.

If you need to, UAC can be quickly re-enabled by repeating these steps, but this time select the ‘Enable UAC’ option within MSConfig.

Disable special effects

Even with the more simplistic look in place, Vista still uses a range of special effects in an attempt to make the Desktop look better. Click ‘Window Color and Appearance’ followed by the ‘Effects’ button and then untick all three boxes that are displayed.

To disable some or all of these effects, press the Windows and Pause/Break keys simultaneously and click ‘Advanced system settings’ to the left. On the ‘Advanced’ tab, click the first of the three Settings buttons and disable any of the effects that you don’t want to use before clicking ‘OK’.

Tweak SuperFetch

There’s certainly some controversy surrounding the idea that disabling Vista’s SuperFetch feature actually helps to improve performance – to a large extent it will really depend a great deal on how you use your computer.

Launch the Registry Editor and pay a visit to ‘HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\ PrefetchParameters’. In the right-hand of the pane, locate the key named ‘EnablePrefetcher’ and double-click it. You’ll find that its default value will be ‘3?. What this does is automatically cache both application data and boot files. If you change this value to ‘2? this will ensure that only boot files are cached. However, changing its setting to ‘1? will cache only application data, and setting it to ‘0? will disable caching altogether.

SuperFetch can also be disabled using the Services console - take a look at the ‘Disabling services’ box out for more details. It is also worth clearing out the contents of ‘C:\ Windows\Prefetch’ from time to time, to force Windows to rebuild the cache from scratch.

Disable disk space checking

Two reasonably pointless features that are found in Vista involve the annoying display of balloon tips and checks to ensure that you’re not running out of hard drive space.

Disabling both of these features may not make a massive difference to performance, but in conjunction with other minor tweaks, every little boost will help leach back resources. Launch the Registry Editor and navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer’ before clicking ‘Edit’ > ‘New’ > ‘DWORD (32-Bit) Value’. Name the new item ‘NoLowDiskSpaceChecks’ and then double-click it before assigning it a value of ‘1?.

Now you’ll need to navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced’ and look for three DWORD values called ‘EnableBalloonTips’, ‘FolderContentsInfoTip’ and ‘StartButtonBalloonTip’, creating them if they do not already exist. Doubleclick each value in turn and assign each of them a value of ‘0?.

Disabling hardware

In the days of Windows XP, it was possible to create hardware profiles which could be used for different purposes.

For general computing a profile where available hardware devices were enabled was ideal, while when it came to gaming, a profile which only loaded the drivers for hardware which was essential was better suited.

Unfortunately, hardware profiles were dropped from Vista and there isn’t any proper alternative. That said, it’s still worth checking that all of the hardware you have installed is essential, and if there’s anything which isn’t used very often, or indeed at all, it can be unplugged and uninstalled via the Device Manager.

Non-essential hardware can also be disabled on a temporary basis to free up as many system resources as possible, again using Device Manager. Press Windows + Pause /Break, click the ‘Device Manager’ link and expand the tree structure to display all the currently installed hardware. Right-click an item to be disabled and select ‘Disable’, reversing this process when the device is needed again.

Maintain your HDD

It’s an obvious point, but if you want to ensure maximum performance at all times, it’s important to take care of your hard drive. Unnecessary files and programs are a waste of space and can lead to a drive that runs inefficiently when the process of tidying up your hard drive can be automated to some degree.

Click the ‘Start’ orb and then click ‘All Programs’ > ‘Accessories’ > ‘System Tools’ > ‘Disk Cleanup’. Choose a drive from the drop down menu and click ‘OK’ to perform a scan. From the list that’s displayed, select any of the types of file, which should be deleted and click ‘OK’ to start a clear out.

Additional space can be freed up by moving to the ‘More Options’ tab and using the two buttons to remove unwanted software and unnecessary System Restore points. Having deleted a large amount of unwanted data, defragmentation is important to help better organise the files on your drive. Launch Disk Defragmenter from the System Tools section of the Start menu and click ‘Defragment’ now to start the optimisation process.

As with all previous versions of Windows, the Vista OS is ripe for a right good tweaking, and spending a little time customising operating system settings can pay noticeable dividends, helping to dramatically improve system performance.

The time spent adjusting settings is, frankly, a small price to pay for squeezing a bit more power from your rig, and it’s certainly a cheaper option than heading out and buying a new system or hardware upgrades.

Using tweaking tools

In the days of Windows 9x, Me and XP, Microsoft programmers produced a fantastically useful tweaking tool in the form of TweakUI. Unfortunately, there’s no Vista version of this tool available, but plenty of alternatives have been developed by third parties.

One such program is TweakVI. The program is available in three versions – Ultimate, Premium and Free. For basic, essential tweaking, the Free version is sufficient, so download the setup file and start the installation.

Installing TweakVI is a fairly standard affair, but there are few caveats to watch out for. When asked to register the software, enter your name as ‘SKIP’ to avoid having to disclose your email address.

After taking up the opportunity to create a Restore Point, indicate that a copy of EasyBCD is not required and the installation will continue. When complete, launch the program and click the ‘Start the freeware version’ button and work through the various options. By default, TweakVI displays option which cannot actually be used in the free version of the program, but these options can be hidden.

Another free tweaking tool worthy of mention is the Ultimate Windows Tweaker. After extraction, the program doesn’t require installation and can be copied to a USB drive so it can be used on other computers.

One of the most basic tweaks available is to speed up the display of menus – achieved by moving the slider in the first section of the program – but this can make a dramatic improvement to the usability of Windows. Many of the tweaks mentioned in this feature can be enabled through the Ultimate Windows Tweaker, and this is a good option if you don’t feel happy editing the registry.

Disable services

You can speed up Vista by disabling unnecessary Services. These are components of Windows, which can run automatically in the background without the need for user intervention. Some Services control essential components such as networking, but there are a huge number which are entirely unnecessary.

To start taking control, press Windows + R simultaneously, type ’services.msc’ and press [Enter] to access the Services console. A large number of services will be displayed by default, and the list may be larger on some systems depending on the software that’s installed.

Just which services can be safely disabled will vary greatly from one machine to another, and is largely dependent on what it’s used for. For a comprehensive list of all of Vista’s services including advice about whether they should be disabled and details of their role to help with decision making, take a look at the Black Viper Service Guide.

For starters, here is a list of services that can be safely disabled on the vast majority of computers; DFS Replication, Diagnostic Policy Service, Distributed Link Tracking Client, IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules, IPsec Policy Agent, KtmRm for Distributed Transaction Coordinator, Offl ine Files, Remote Registry, Secondary Logon, Security Center, SSDP Discovery, Tablet PC Input Service, Terminal Services, Windows Defender, Windows Error Reporting Service and Windows Search.

To disable an individual service, locate it in the list and then double-click it. On the dialog that’s displayed, click the ‘Stop’ button to terminate the service, and then select ‘Disabled’ from the ‘Startup type’ drop down menu. Click ‘OK’ and start to work through any other services you have determined you don’t need.

Just as with registry editing, changing service settings is potentially dangerous, so it’s a good idea to create a restore point before applying any tweaks.

Edit and back up the reg

Make sure you safeguard your settings in case the worst happens, but remember providing care is taken to work with the correct keys and no spelling mistakes are made, editing the registry should be fairly safe. This huge database is so central to Vista that if anything goes wrong it can have some very devastating consequences. Beware!

In the main text of this feature we have recommended that System Restore be disabled to free up system resources, but this tool can be used to create a backup of the registry which can then be easily restored if necessary. Before undertaking any registry editing, temporarily re-enable System Restore by reversing the steps above and then click Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > System Restore. Click the ‘Open system protection’ link at the bottom of the dialog and then click the ‘Create’ button. Enter a suitable name for the restore point and click ‘Create’ before waiting for the process to complete.

When editing the registry, it’s advisable to apply one tweak at a time, as this means that if something goes wrong, identifying the culprit is much easier. Should a registry backup ever be needed, launch System Restore using the method outlined previously, but this time select the option labelled ‘Choose a different restore point’ before clicking ‘Next’. From the list that’s displayed, select the required restore point and click ‘Next’ and then finish off.

If a session of registry editing results in an unbootable system, it is still possible to make use of System Restore in Safe Mode. Restart your computer and tap the F8 key during the boot process. From the menu that is displayed, use the cursor keys to highlight the ‘Safe Mode with Networking’ option and press Enter. Choose a restore point to use, as described before, and then restart Windows in the usual fashion.Source: techradar

Check Out Ads for more tweaks

Friday, March 20, 2009

Windows 7 is coming. So what?

You may be aware that Microsoft is readying a new operating system. It’s been dubbed Windows 7. When it is released, you can expect brass bands, dancing girls and mighty huzzahs. But why?

Windows runs your machine. It’s the middleman. It tells your programs and your computer how to work together. In geekese, it manages resources. Don’t worry about that. Let us return to the days of yesteryear, when MS-DOS ruled the PC land. You’d get this on your computer screen: C:\. To the right of the backslash blinked the cursor. That wasn’t particularly intuitive. People wanted something better. Thus was born the graphical user interface. Buttons, links, formatting to click on. Today’s Windows is a very advanced GUI; so is Mac’s OS X.

Windows improved all through the 1990s. Then, in 2001, Windows XP appeared. It didn’t crash. It didn’t cause trouble at all. People just loved it.

Jump to January 2007. Windows Vista appeared. Bombastic promotion. Events to draw crowds. But the old flying-out-the-doors spirit wasn’t there. The “experts” said Vista was a memory hog, it had too many problems, people didn’t want it. I say people stuck with XP.

See, people don’t just go out and buy a new operating system. They buy computers with the new Windows. But, this time, they didn’t need to upgrade. Why spend $800 when you like XP?

I need to know new technology. I bought a half-dozen computers in January 2007. All had Vista. The hardware has been a pain. Vista has performed flawlessly.

So, now comes Windows 7. The guys are looking forward to the dancing girls. And we will switch; we have to be out-front. But most people couldn’t care less. They get their operating system with their computer. And they still like XP, which is now eight years old. Or they like Vista.

Why does Microsoft bother with this extravaganza? That’s a good question. And I don’t know for sure. But I have a theory. (It’s possible that 800 people thought of it before me. If you’re one, please be nice.)

Microsoft watchers think nearly all profits come from Windows and Office. (This decade, we have had Office 2000, 2002 (XP), 2003 and 2007). The rest of Microsoft’s software is peanuts.

When the umpteenth Windows version appears, Microsoft isn’t really pushing Windows. It’s selling computers. Nearly everyone gets the new operating system with the computer. No computer sales, no Windows sales. (I’m not counting early adopting geeks. Microsoft can’t live on them.)

Most people probably like their machines. I don’t see a big blastoff for Windows 7. If you like XP or Vista, stick with it.

This is a terrible problem for Microsoft. Coming down the road are Google and the Cloud. Google is believed to have a million servers, more or less.

The logical use for those servers is cloud computing. You get an old computer out of the closet. On it, you install a free, small Linux operating system. But the real operating system is on Google servers. You access them through the Internet. Ergo, the Cloud.

Most people hate buying new computers. They despise learning new software. The Cloud should cure both.

How much will it cost? Maybe nothing. Whatever, it will be less than today’s almost yearly changes.

I can’t be sure this is coming. But I would be willing to bet on it.

And where will it leave Microsoft, arguably the globe’s most powerful firm?

Less than a decade ago, newspapers were rich and powerful. Then, the Internet abruptly reshaped the news world. That could happen to Microsoft. Without Windows and Office, what does it really have for personal computers?

Source: usatoday

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

10 Things Windows 7 Must Do To Succeed

I recently attended a briefing where Microsoft explained some of the new features in Windows 7 to reviewers from different publications. At the end of the meeting, the MS folks asked the half-dozen of us present what it will take for the new OS to be a success.”Injecting about three trillion dollars into the economy to end this recession,” was my initial response. It’s hard to imagine any new OS will be a success, especially with business customers, until the economy improves. What we are already using works just fine, thank you. It will have to see us through.

So, let’s fast forward in the economic cycle to the inevitable uptick, when investing in business computing becomes easier. Here are 10 things Windows 7 will have to do.

1. Windows 7 should not be positioned in relation to Windows Vista, which is nonexistent in most businesses. Windows 7 needs to be related back to Windows XP, to which I think it is the legitimate successor.

2. I don’t see Windows 7 as Vista SP2 or Vista Lite or anything like this. Windows 7 looks like a new OS to me and deserves to be treated as such. (Readers: Give Windows 7 a chance, OK?)

3. Windows 7 needs to run just fine on hardware the runs Windows XP just fine today. My sense, playing with Windows 7, is this is possible. Vista grabbed an early reputation as a resource hog. Windows 7 must avoid this.

4. Because Windows 7 cannot upgrade an existing Windows XP installation, Microsoft needs to provide easy transition tools. A copy of Windows 7 and a flash drive or small stack of DVDs needs to move all my data and my applications and my settings to the new OS. This may mean Microsoft needs to send an applications disc with Windows 7.

5. Just for emphasis: If I have to reinstall my applications, Windows 7 will not be a welcome upgrade.

6. If Microsoft does not or cannot accomplish the previous items, then it should not promote Windows 7 as an upgrade and offer it on new hardware only. This will avoid one of the major factors in Vista’s failure: It’s inability to run well on what people already owned.

7. Fortunately, the Windows 7 user experience is not wildly different from XP the way Vista is. This will make it easier for companies (or households) to have a mix of Windows XP and Windows 7.

8. I like what I have seen of Windows 7, but have yet to hear Microsoft offer a good reason besides “a wide range of improvements” for me to upgrade. If it comes only on new hardware, that’s fine. And, yes, some people will then decide they like the new OS and upgrade older machines as a result. But, if Microsoft hopes to sell an upgrade it needs to look at how Apple sells its upgrades.

9. Speaking of which: Apple sells features and applications that are included with the OS as major upgrade benefits. If Microsoft included more significant applications with the OS, maybe it could make them as important as the iApps are to Apple customers. Apple manages to charge its best customers up to $300-a-year for upgrades of some sort.

10. I think we have solved the problem of linking Windows 7 too closely to the release of Office 14 now that the timing between two seems clearly offset. Delays, economic or technical, should not bring the two releases back together. At least, not until its clear from seeing the software that one won’t drag down the other.

I won’t say those are the “top 10? things Microsoft needs to do to make Windows 7 a success. My experience with the OS is too limited for me to feel I’ve considered all the angles, but these suggestions are a good place for Redmond to start.

Source: pcworld

Friday, March 13, 2009

Netbooks Open Door to Windows Alternatives

As netbooks surge in popularity, open-source Linux-based operating systems have established a toehold on the low-cost, stripped-down computers as an alternative to Microsoft Corp's Windows. Although analysts say no more than 15 to 20 percent of netbooks are running Linux platforms such as Ubuntu, the growing demand for the devices has jolted Microsoft, whose Windows Vista operating system was too bulky to run on many netbooks.
The first netbooks to emerge in 2007, such as Asustek's Eee PC, ran Linux. Microsoft quickly recovered by making its older Windows XP operating system available on netbooks, where it is now the dominant platform. The average consumer is still more comfortable with the ease and familiarity of the Windows experience. But the contest may still be in the early innings. The expected release of laptops running Google Inc's Linux-based Android operating system - which many including Microsoft are predicting - would inject fresh competition into the market. Moreover, analysts say equipment makers have an interest in helping to nurture a Windows alternative to help them save on licensing fees.
Forrester Vice President J.P. Gownder said that although Microsoft's platform now rules the netbook segment, it was initially embarrassed when the devices began to sell without Vista. "It is the first crack in any of the armor at all," Gownder said. The software giant is tailoring a version of its forthcoming Windows 7 operating system for the devices, and the early word so far has been positive, analysts say. However Chris Kenyon, director of business development at Canonical, said that light, portable, Web-centric netbooks are the "sweet spot" for the Ubuntu operating system, which Canonical sponsors. "We've seen the biggest manufacturers in the world establish and push non-Windows operating systems and have seen it established as a mainline product." Kenyon expects there to be "many times" more pre-installs of Ubuntu this year than last. PC heavyweights such as Hewlett-Packard Co, Dell Inc and Lenovo all offer netbooks with Linux-based platforms, as well as Windows versions.
Jay Pinkert, a Dell spokesman, said Ubuntu allows the company to appeal to the open-source community, and also offer a product at a lower price point. Linux operating systems are free to license - Canonical makes money through support and upgrades for Ubuntu - while Microsoft receives as much as $60 for its netbook version of XP, analysts say. "As long as customers find value in having an Ubuntu option we'll continue to have it in the mix," Pinkert said.
Netbooks are expected to be one of the only PC segments showing strength in 2009, with analysts estimating global shipments of anywhere from 20-to-30 million in 2009. Although no one predicts an end to Windows dominance any time soon, some do see some opportunity for Linux netbooks in emerging markets, where cost is the overriding concern. And others see potential for emerging open-source operating systems on netbooks. "The big move to Linux will come when Android comes out on the netbook platform... That's what's really going to open up Linux," said Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group. He said netbooks are perfect for so-called "cloud-based" computing - with applications hosted on networks rather than on PCs - and that the Android platform, if designed well, could find some traction. Android is used on smartphones like HTC Corp's G1, but is being designed to support all kinds of connected devices. Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney was skeptical that anything can seriously dent Windows' supremacy, but said Android's emergence would make things interesting. "If Google got in with Android that would be a good statement, Dulaney said. "It would give Google a placeholder in a market that may grow from bottom up." Microsoft in January partly blamed netbooks for weaker-than-expected quarterly profits. The company makes only half as much on its netbook software as it does for a standard notebook, analysts estimate. Microsoft expects to ship a low-end Windows 7 f

Monday, March 9, 2009

AutoRun patch for Windows XP users

Nearly 18 months after it was discovered, Microsoft has finally fixed a hole in the AutoRun function of older Windows versions that allowed viruses to spread via external storage devices.
While it's good to know Microsoft is finally listening to the complaints of the Windows community, the company's delay in applying important patches put our systems at risk unnecessarily.
The old saying about the squeaky wheel getting the grease applies to the manner in which Microsoft prioritizes its product fixes. The more noise customers make, the more likely the problems will be rectified. Most recently, the Conficker worm has been spreading across networks, often entering systems via USB flash drives and other removable media. Shamefully, Microsoft could have — and should have — prevented this massive infection from happening in the first place.
In October 2007, Nick Brown documented in his blog how viruses and worms were entering his network via USB memory sticks. The next month, WS associate editor Scott Dunn explained in a Top Story on Nov. 8, 2007, the fact that Microsoft's suggested settings to disable AutoRun weren't effective. He described the so-called @SYS trick, which allows you to truly disable AutoRun, preventing infected devices from launching their attacks.
Fast-forward to one year ago. Will Dormann and US-CERT (the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team) published information on Mar. 20, 2008, confirming that Microsoft's AutoRun advice didn't block threats. The same @SYS workaround that Scott documented was supported by US-CERT in its alert.
In July 2008, Microsoft released security bulletin MS08-038. The patch in this bulletin made it possible for users to control AutoRun properly, but only on Windows Vista and Server 2008.

XP, Win 2K, Server 2003 users left in the lurch

So what happened to the equivalent patch for Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003? In May 2008, Microsoft had in fact released a patch for these systems, which is described in Knowledge Base article 953252. However, as described in a Jan. 22, 2009, Computerworld article, US-CERT found that the fix for XP/2000/2003 had to be applied manually. Furthermore, Microsoft was not making the patch available automatically via any Windows Update service.
It wasn't until Feb. 24 of this year that Microsoft distributed this patch via Windows Update to XP, 2000, and 2003. This is described in the company's security advisory 967940.
Many home and business PC users rarely deploy patches that aren't available through Windows Update, Microsoft Update, or WSUS (Windows Software Update Services). Add to this the confusing and conflicting information about the AutoRun patch, and it's no wonder the Conficker worm, which exploits AutoRun functionality, made the inroads that it did.
You may be wondering why it took Microsoft so long to distribute for XP/2000/2003 users the fix that permits AutoRun to be properly disabled. One clue may be found in the file versions listed in KB article 967715. The Windows Server 2003 files are dated Feb. 10, 2009. Typically, Microsoft doesn't release a fix for one platform if it's still developing a fix for another platform. This is done to avoid putting one set of customers at risk while protecting others.
That's usually a valid reason to wait before distributing patches. But when you open up the files described in the earlier KB article 953252, you find that all the files in that hotfix date back to mid-2008.
Why did it take an admonition from CERT to convince Microsoft to add this vital fix to Automatic Updates for those versions of Windows? To make things even more confusing, the way Microsoft released the XP/2000/2003 fix at the end of February caused many people to think it was an out-of-cycle security patch.
If this patch had been pushed to all Windows users sooner, much of Conficker's pain might have been avoided.
Microsoft's Feb. 6 TechNet alert makes the problem clear. Among other things, the Conficker worm uses the AutoPlay feature (which is related to but separate from AutoRun) to infect PCs via USB drives and other portable storage devices. This vulnerability occurs even if the systems have installed the update described in Microsoft security bulletin MS08-067. Therefore, the TechNet article recommends disabling AutoRun, saying:

  • "Disable the AutoPlay feature through the Registry or using Group Policies, as discussed in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 953252. Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 customers must deploy the update associated with Microsoft Knowledge Base article 953252 to be able to successfully disable the AutoRun feature. Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 customers must deploy the security update associated with Microsoft security bulletin MS08-038 to be able to successfully disable the AutoRun feature."

(What's the difference between AutoRun and AutoPlay? AutoPlay associates multimedia file types with specific applications, while AutoRun executes autorun.inf files found on various drives. For more on the distinctions between AutoRun and AutoPlay, see Microsoft's help article on the subject.)
For home users, I'm not yet ready to pull the fire alarm and tell everyone to disable AutoRun. But I do urge you to be very leery of plugging USB flash drives into your system if you're unsure whether they've been used on other computers. Large organizations, however, should consider disabling AutoRun on their networked PCs, considering how hard it's been to stomp out the Conficker worm and others.

How to apply the patches and control AutoRun

If you followed the instructions in Scott's 2007 article to block AutoRun by adding a Registry key, you should remove the key before applying the Microsoft AutoRun patch to prevent any possible interaction. Take the following steps for complete protection:

  • Step 1. Remove the @SYS line from the Registry, if you added it. In Windows XP, click Start, Run. (In Vista, click Start.) Type regedit and press Enter. In the left pane, navigate to and select the following key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SOFTWARE \ Microsoft \ Windows NT \ CurrentVersion \ IniFileMapping \ Autorun.inf
    Press the Del key to remove the key. Close the Registry Editor.

  • Step 2. Install the patch described in KB article 953252 (for Vista and Windows Server 2008) or 967715 (for XP, 2000, and Server 2003).

  • Step 3. For security reasons, it's strongly recommended you disable AutoRun for all devices. In non-Home versions of XP and Vista, use the Group Policy Editor. In XP, click Start, Run. (In Vista, click Start.) Type gpedit.msc and press Enter. In the left pane, under Computer Configuration, expand Administrative Templates.
    In XP Professional, select System in the right pane under Administrative Templates, right-click Turn off Autoplay in the right pane, and choose Properties. Click Enabled, select All drives in the "Turn off Autoplay" box, click OK, and close the Group Policy Editor.
    In Vista Business and higher, expand Windows Components and select AutoPlay Policies. In the right pane, double-click Turn off Autoplay, click Enabled, choose All drives in the drop-down menu next to "Turn off Autoplay on," click OK, and close the Group Policy Editor.
    To disable AutoRun in the Home versions of XP and Vista — which don't have the Group Policy Editor — use the Registry Editor. In XP, click Start, Run. (In Vista, click Start.) Type regedit and press Enter. Navigate to and select the following key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ Software \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion \ Policies \ Explorer
    In the right pane, double-click NoDriveTypeAutoRun, enter 0xFF in the "Value data" field, make sure Hexadecimal is selected under Base, click OK, and exit the Registry Editor.

  • Step 4. If you ever need to re-enable AutoRun for a certain system, open the Group Policy Editor (on non-Home versions of Windows) or the Registry Editor (Home versions). Then follow the instructions in KB article 967715 (for XP, 2000, and Server 2003) or 953252 (for Vista and Windows Server 2008) to return AutoRun to its default state or customize its settings. AutoRun can be configured, for instance, to work differently for CD-ROMs than for other media.

Once you've disabled AutoRun, you'll have to use Windows Explorer to access data files on the USB memory devices and optical media you insert in your system. If you load a disc that contains audio or video, you may want to open your favorite media player to run the content. However, this is a small price to pay for the security edge you gain by disabling AutoRun.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Windows Mobile 7 Announced for 2010

Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer has recently confirmed that Windows Mobile7 will be available sometime next year. Although no specific data has been set yet, it’s still quite an exciting OS to look forward to. Of course there’s still the version 6.5 to contend with this year with stiff competition coming in from Palm’s Pre, TouchFlow, RIM and even LG’s new S-Class 3D UI.

Image Source

Nevertheless, Windows Mobile has been around for a long enough time for users to appreciate the various upgrades it’s been through and with the ‘Touch’ generation taking over, I personally can’t wait to see what the 6.5 edition will be capable of doing and how it’ll handle. According to a few reports , WinMo 7 will have a tighter integration with Windows 7 for PCs that should be out come September of this year. The UI itself will obviously be optimized for finger touch and hopefully do away with the stylus altogether is what I’m hoping.

Image Source

It’s something to look forward to for now. To know more of what Ballmer had to say on the subject click here.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Windows Live Messenger Installation Error 1601, Error 1603 and Error 1635

After you upgrade to Windows Installer version 2.0, the Windows Installer Service may not start, and you may receive the following error message:
The Windows Installer Service could not be accessed. This can occur if you are running Windows in safe mode, or the Windows Installer is not correctly installed. Contact your support personnel for assistance.
CAUSE
This behavior can occur when either of the following conditions exist:
• In the DCOM permissions, the default authentication level is set to None, and the default Impersonation level is set to Anonymous.
• The system account does not have Full permissions on a folder or registry key that the Windows Installer is trying to access. This is NTFS-specific.
SOLUTION
Method 1: Unregister and re-register the Windows Installer
1. Click Start, click Run, type MSIEXEC /UNREGISTER, and then click OK. Even if you do this correctly, it may look like nothing occurs.
2. Click Start, click Run, type MSIEXEC /REGSERVER, and then click OK. Even if you do this correctly, it may look like nothing occurs, or you may briefly see an hourglass. After you run this command, the operation is complete.
3. Try your Windows Installer-based application again.
Back to the top Back to the top
Method 2: Verify the DCOM permissions
This method involves changing the DCOM default impersonation level to Identify, removing the Msisip.dll file, and then reinstalling SP 3 for Windows 2000.
To do this, follow these steps:
1. Click Start, click Run, type dcomcnfg, and then click OK.
2. On the Default Properties tab:
a. In the Default Authentication Level list, click Connect.
b. In the Default Impersonation Level list, click Identify, and then click OK.
3. Click Start, click Run, type explorer /select, %windir%\system32\msisip.dll, and then click OK.
4. Rename the Msisip.dll file as Msisip.old.
5. Reinstall Windows 2000 Service Pack 3.
Back to the top Back to the top
Method 3: Give Full Control permission to the SYSTEM account
1. Start Windows Explorer, right-click the computer's root hard drive, and then click Properties.
2. Click the Security tab, and then click Add.
3. In the Select Users, Computers, or Groups dialog box, click the SYSTEM account, click Add, and then click OK.
4. Under Allow, click to select the Full Control check box, and then click OK.
5. Click the TEMP folder and then verify that the SYSTEM account has full control.
Back to the top Back to the top
Method 4: Verify the registry permissions
1. Click Start, click Run, then type Regedt32.
2. For each of the registry hives, follow these steps:
a. Select the hive.
b. For Windows XP, on the Edit menu, click Permissions.
For Windows 2000 and Windows NT 4, on the Security menu, click Permissions.
3. Verify that the SYSTEM account has been added and that it has Full control. If it does not, add the SYSTEM account with Full control.
Back to the top Back to the top
Method 5: Fix the broken security key for the MsiServer service
1. Start the computer by using Windows 2000.
2. Click Start, click Run, type regedit.exe, and then rename the following key to Old_Security:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSIServer\Security
3. Restart the computer (you must do this).
4. Run Instmsiw.exe for installer 2.0 again; this corrects the broken security key for the MSI service.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Windows 7 might just change Microsoft’s luck

Let us cut to the chase. Will the next iteration of Microsoft’s dominant operating system be any good? After spending a couple of weeks playing around with the beta version of the software, our verdict is that yes, it will be. But why? Windows Vista was a marketing and public relations disaster.

Vista, which was code-named Longhorn , was delayed by over a year and many people who bought machines with the Vista Capable logo on it were horrified to see that Windows Vista barely managed to work on their hardware when they upgraded from Windows XP.

It must be understood that Vista was the first operating system the Redmond-based behemoth launched after the advent of social media blogs, MySpace, Twitter, Facebook, Digg and the like. Technology blogs and websites took no time in shredding Vista.

But the fact is, if you have a new computer (with dual-core processor and at least two gigabytes of memory), and not a Netbook, Vista works quite well. The integrated search function on Vista is brilliant if you, like most people, have files spread all across your computer.

Source: sify

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Adding Windows 7-Style Icons to Vista

As most Windows watchers know by now, Windows 7 brings a handful of interface tweaks to the table, starting with large, eye-pleasing program icons that take up residence in the taskbar. Of course, this is little more than an update to the Quick Launch feature that debuted in Windows XP. And believe it or not, Vista users can easily bring that Windows 7 look to their own taskbars.

Here’s how:

1. Right-click any open space in the taskbar and clear the checkmark from Lock the Taskbar.

2. Right-click the taskbar again and choose Toolbars, Quick Launch. A small batch of icons appears next to the Start button.

3. Click and drag the Quick Launch toolbar’s right handle to the right to create some extra icon space.

4. Right-click in an open space within that toolbar, then choose View, Large Icons.

Presto! Now your Vista taskbar should look a lot like Windows 7’s. To add icons, just drag and drop any program, folder, or individual file to the Quick Launch toolbar.

I’ll admit I’m not so ga-ga over Windows 7’s interface changes as some folks, but as a longtime Quick Launch fan, I’m definitely liking these larger icons.

Source: washingtonpost

Friday, February 13, 2009

Microsoft repeats IE8 lock-in warning for XP users with SP3

Microsoft Corp. today again warned users of Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) that they may not be able to uninstall either the service pack or Internet Explorer 8 (IE8).The warning, made by Jane Maliouta, a Microsoft program manager as the company delivered Release Candidate 1 (RC1) on Monday, was a repeat of a caution she gave last August when Microsoft launched the browser’s second beta.

In a post to the IE blog, Maliouta recommended that users who had installed IE8 Beta 1 or Beta 2 before upgrading Windows XP to SP3, manually uninstall the older IE8 previews. Users who don’t take her advice will be stuck with both IE8 RC1 and Windows XP SP3.

“Windows XP SP3 and IE8 RC1 will become permanent,” Maliouta said. “You will still be able to upgrade to later IE8 builds as they become available, but you won’t be able to uninstall them.” As in August, when Windows XP SP3 users ran into the same situation as they upgraded from IE8 Beta 1 to Beta 2, a warning dialog will appear.

To avoid lock-in, Maliouta told users to first uninstall Windows XP SP3, then uninstall IE8 Beta 1 or Beta 2; they should then reinstall XP SP3 and follow that by installing IE8 RC1.

The big change in RC1’s deployment, Maliouta said in a video question-and-answer posted to the TechNet site, is that Microsoft no longer asks users of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 to manually uninstall earlier IE previews before installing RC1. “We definitely heard feedback about how difficult it was,” she said, referring to the earlier requirement.

Because of the change, Microsoft will be able to push the RC1 update to all users running IE8 Beta 1 or Beta 2 via Windows Update, a change from August when people running Vista and Server 2008 had to manually do a download. Microsoft, however, has not said when it will trigger the RC1 update, nor did Maliouta specify a date today.

Also unknown is a timetable for delivering an update to people running Windows 7 beta, Microsoft’s preview of its next operating system. The company unveiled the public beta Jan. 10.

Because of the timing of Windows 7’s beta, its version of IE8 is a “pre-RC,” according to James Pratt, a senior product manager for IE. Microsoft will upgrade IE8 in Windows 7 to RC1 via Windows Update, Maliouta said, although she did not disclose a timeline. Users will also be able to download IE8 RC1 manually from the company’s Web site, she added.

At least one additional update is required before IE8 RC can be installed, or before it will run. Without one of the two slated for Vista, IE8 RC1 will balk during setup and show an error message of “Setup cannot continue because one or more updates required to install Windows Internet Explorer 8 are not present.” That patch is a revised version of a Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) prerequisite that in February 2008 sent machines into an endless round of reboots.

Systems already running Vista SP1 will have that update in place.

Microsoft has also posted a support document that offers installation troubleshooting tips, as well as release notes that spell out compatibility problems with a variety of software, including Intuit Corp.’s popular TurboTax tax preparation program, Google Inc.’s Toolbar and older versions of the Skype voice-over-IP add-on. Older editions of Microsoft’s own Windows Live Login add-on — which was installed with earlier versions of the Windows Live Essentials suite — are also incompatible with IE8, and are, in fact, unstable.

Users can download IE8 RC1 for Windows XP, Vista, Server 2003 and Server 2008 from Microsoft’s site. The new browser will not run on Windows 2000.

Source: computerworld

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Windows 7 will come in many flavors

Despite criticism that Windows Vista came in too many versions, Microsoft is moving ahead with plans to offer just as many editions of Windows 7. Although the software maker will offer at least six distinct versions of the new operating system, Microsoft said to expect almost all PCs sold in the U.S. to come with either the Home Premium or Professional editions of the operating system.

“We’re going to focus on two versions,” Microsoft Senior Vice President Bill Veghte said in an interview, noting that those two versions will likely account for 80 percent of Windows 7 sales.

Still, versions of Windows 7 will include: Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate. Unlike with Vista, however, the Home Basic version will be sold only in emerging markets.

So, if Microsoft is going to focus on two, why bother with all of the other versions? Veghte says it comes down to the fact that there are just so many places in which Windows is sold.

For emerging markets, for example, Microsoft needs to have lower-priced versions. As a result, Microsoft plans the severely limited Windows 7 Starter as well as the bare bones, but relatively full-featured home basic version. Volume license customers will be able to get an enterprise version that includes BitLocker encryption and a couple of other enterprise-only features. For consumers who really want access to those features, there will again be an Ultimate version of the operating system.

That’s not to say Microsoft is doing everything the same with Windows 7. Veghte said that Microsoft learned some important lessons from Vista.

One specific criticism with the Vista packages was the fact that there were features in Home Premium that weren’t in the pricier Vista Business edition. With Windows 7, each higher-priced version will be a superset of the other versions. For example, the Professional version of Windows 7 includes Windows Media Center.

Also, Microsoft will make it easier to move from one version to another. With Vista, Microsoft introduced the notion of being able to easily upgrade from one version to another, though a special upgrade disk was needed. Windows 7, despite its many versions, will actually come as a single piece of code, or image. That means all the features will come loaded onto a Windows 7 PC, ready to be unlocked with an upgrade product key.

As for the specific versions, Windows 7 Starter has some of the key features of WIndows 7, such as the new taskbar, but not the live thumbnail previews. It is also limited to three applications running at a time and will have limitations on the kinds of screen resolutions and processors it will support.

Home Basic, which will be sold only in emerging markets, removes the screen size, processor, and open application limits and adds support for Internet connection sharing and the new sensor and location-based features. However, Home Basic lacks such things as multitouch support or the Aero interface. DVD playback and Windows Media Center are also found in the Home Premium and Professional editions, but not in Basic or Starter.

The ability to use presentation mode or join a domain are two examples of features that are found in Windows 7 Professional, but not in any of the home versions. Finally, you’ll need either Ultimate or Enterprise for a few features, such as DirectAccess, BitLocker, or booting from a virtual hard drive.

Regardless of the rationale, having so many versions of Windows 7–not to mention any additional versions mandated by antitrust regulators around the world–will certainly open Microsoft up to additional criticism and probably some mocking from the folks in Cupertino.

To some degree, the customization is necessary. After all, while Apple may boast of only having one version–it essentially targets only the high end of the consumer market–the segment served by Home Premium.

However, the need for an Ultimate version, particularly now that the Professional version will have Media Center and other consumer features, seems somewhat dubious.

Source: cnet

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Gamers, enterprises saying yes to Windows Vista

The Internet’s chattering classes may have already given up on Windows Vista, but two key segments of the PC population apparently haven’t.More than a third of online gamers are running Windows Vista, according to a January survey (scroll down to “Windows version”) by online gaming company Valve Corp. That’s almost double the 18% of the nearly 2 million online gamers surveyed by Valve last August.

Meanwhile, almost one third of North American and European corporations have started deploying Vista, according to a report released late last week by Forrester Research.

While Vista has been bashed repeatedly, IT managers are actually “slowly warming” to the operating system two years after its release, wrote analyst Ben Gray.

Nearly 10% of enterprise PCs were running Vista in August and September, when Forrester interviewed 962 IT decision makers at North American and European companies.

Despite “considerable interest in Windows 7,” Gray wrote, Windows Vista is finally shaping out to be the operating system that dethrones Windows XP.”

XP still dominates, with a 71% share, but that is down 16% from its 87% share of corporate desktops in Forrester’s survey results in the three months earlier.

XP is a “lame-duck operating system,” Gray wrote.

Similarly, XP is still run by 65% of players at Steam, an online site for PC gaming that requires users to run Windows 2000, XP or Vista. But 34% were running Vista, which offers more advanced graphics-rendering capabilities desired by gamers.

Those running the 32-bit version of Vista outnumbered users of the more advanced 64-bit flavor by a ratio of three to one — an indicator of how representative of the overall consumer population Steam’s sample is.

Besides the 30% of IT managers who told Forrester last fall they were already deploying Vista, another 27% said they planned to deploy Vista this year or in 2010.

In the Forrester report, Gray did not address the impact of the recent economic downturn and reports late last year that corporations would cut back on their 2009 IT spending plans.

Fifteen percent of respondents told Forrester last fall they planned to skip Vista for Windows 7, with another 28% reporting “no plans” or “don’t know.”

Despite increasing hints that Windows 7 may ship by this Christmas, Gray continues to peg its release for early 2010. As such, he advises companies worried about Microsoft cutting mainstream support for XP after April to upgrade to Vista now.

“Windows 7 will not be dramatically different from Windows Vista since it’s built on the same code base to ensure greater application and hardware compatibility - rather it’s an evolutionary update with more user-facing enhancements,” he wrote. “The bottom line is if you are going to skip Windows Vista on some or all of your PCs, you will need to move very quickly to deploy Windows 7, particularly if you wait until Service Pack 1, as most enterprises do.”

Mac OS X had a 3% share of corporate PCs, while Linux had 2%. Gray expects Apple’s operating system to “maintain its niche business status,” though “progressive organizations are flirting with desktop and application virtualization” to enable Mac usage, “and some are even experimenting with ‘bring your own PC to work’ programs” that also allow Macs, he wrote.

Source: computerworld

Browsing behind Windows Vista

Windows Vista has a new security construct called Mandatory Integrity Controls (MIC), which is similar to integrity functionality long available in the Linux and Unix worlds. In Vista, all security principals (users, computers, services, and so on) and objects (files, registry keys, folders, and resources) are given MIC labels.

A subject of lesser integrity cannot modify (write or delete) an object of higher integrity, even if the normal NTFS permissions would otherwise allow it. Perhaps surprisingly, MICs take precedence over traditional file permissions, and it’s critical that they do.

Security principals are assigned MICs in the form of SIDs (security identifiers) that are added to their access tokens during log-on. Objects have MIC labels stored as part of their access controls — specifically within the System Access Control List portion, which is where the auditing attributes are stored as well. When a security principal or a process on behalf of the security principal attempts to access an object, both MICs are checked and their integrity evaluated.

Although many integrity levels exist, Windows regularly uses six label values (from lowest to highest): Untrusted, Low, Medium, High, System, and Trusted Installer. Normal users have Medium integrity. The null/anonymous user is Untrusted. The default built-in Administrator and elevated members of the Administrators group have High integrity. The Windows system kernel and service files rank as System.

Most Web browsers run with Medium integrity by default. Add-on programs normally run as Medium or High. Internet Explorer in its default Protected Mode (enabled for all zones but Trusted Sites) runs with Low integrity for rendering processes, as does Google’s Chrome. Although Internet Explorer was the first browser to support MICs, Chrome actually utilizes them to a greater extent (see the Chrome review). Along with preventing lesser-integrity writes, Chrome prevents lesser-integrity reads as well.

The purpose behind integrity controls, of course, is to give Windows another layer of defense against malicious hackers. For example, if a buffer overflow is able to crash Internet Explorer (and not a third-party add-on or toolbar), the resulting malicious process will often end up with Low integrity and be unable to modify Windows system files. This is the primary reason so many Internet Explorer exploits have resulted in an “important” severity rating for Vista but a higher “critical” rating for Windows XP.

Every Web browser should make use of Vista’s integrity controls to the fullest extent possible. Their implementation significantly improves protection for the end-user. Browsers running in Low integrity, such as Chrome or Internet Explorer, offer additional protections that the others don’t — but should.

Source: infoworld

Microsoft to release four security patches

Microsoft will be releasing four security updates on Tuesday, including two that are critical affecting Windows, Internet Explorer, and Microsoft Exchange Server, the company said on Thursday.The critical updates affect Windows Internet Explorer 7, Windows XP Professional Edition, Windows Vista, Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server, Exchange Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2007, according to the alert.

Two other updates rated important affect SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005 and Office. The vulnerabilities could allow for an attacker to remotely execute code on an unpatched system.

Microsoft will release the security updates on Patch Tuesday, the second Tuesday of the month. The company provides advance notification for customers to alert them as to the software affected but keeps the details vague to prevent exploits from being developed.

Source: cnet

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

SSD tests show Windows 7 beta beating Vista SP1

Windows 7 is supposed to be able to detect that a Solid State Drive (SSD) is being used, and make changes to some settings so that it can take advantage of the technology. TweakTown has run some tests with the Patriot Warp2 128GB SSD SATA drive for both RAID 0 and single drive setups, comparing Windows 7 beta and Windows Vista SP1. Based on the results found, the site has concluded that Windows 7 currently has a slight edge over Vista:

Based on our testing, we can see that obviously Microsoft have spent some time improving SSD performance under Windows 7, as it managed to beat out Vista in all but one test and that might have only been a slip up.

Of course, these tests don’t really represent how all SSDs will perform on Windows 7, though we can expect improvements as better drivers are written. Solid SSD performance will be key in Windows 7’s adoption in future netbooks, a laptop form factor that has really taken off recently, and is expected to keep doing well due to the current economy. Hopefully Microsoft will be able to keep these positive results up with the RC build (expected in April), as well as the RTM. You can check out all of the results at the link below.


Source: arstechnica

Monday, January 26, 2009

Microsoft delays Vista SP2, says report

Microsoft Corp. has delayed Windows Vista Service Pack 2 (SP2) by at least a month, and will now ship it to manufacturing sometime in May or June, according to a Web site that has accurately predicted Windows release dates in the past.

TechARP.com, a Malaysian Web site that correctly pegged the release dates for Vista SP1 and XP SP3 in 2008, said that Microsoft will deliver a release candidate — the final test version — of Vista SP2 in March, a month later than the site had predicted earlier. Also, Microsoft will send the service pack to OEMs and out for retail copy duplication at some point in the second quarter of 2009, not in April as originally thought.

Vista SP2 will be released for download from the Web at an undetermined date after Microsoft ships the service pack to OEMs. In the past, Microsoft has had both short and long lag times between the two dates.

Windows XP SP3, for example, was released to manufacturing April 21, 2008, and offered for download May 6, about two weeks later. With Vista SP1, however, it waited about six weeks after sending the update to manufacturing before it let the general public download the service pack.

Inserted into the Vista SP2 schedule, said TechARP, is something Microsoft’s calling a “release candidate escrow build.” According to the site, an escrow build is a version on which development has stopped, but is handed to developer and testers, who are asked to shake out the code one final time to make sure there are no show-stopping bugs.

Elsewhere, TechARP also said that computer makers will not be required to use Vista SP2 on new hardware, as is usually the case when the Microsoft wraps up a major update, such as a service pack. “OEMs will not be compelled to ship their systems with the new builds, which would have required extensive work [such as] tests, implementation and logistics,” said TechARP. “They are also not required to send their customers the Service Pack 2 upgrades.”

TechARP speculated that Microsoft will make Vista SP2 optional for OEMs because Windows 7, Vista’s successor, may be hard on its heels. “Many OEMs are probably hesitant about spending more money and [putting more] effort into qualifying the new builds with their products, especially in light of the current economic situation,” said the site. “So the onus will be on the consumer to update their Windows Vista via Windows Update.”

Microsoft issued the first public beta of Windows 7 on Jan. 10, but as of yet, has not set a timetable for the new operating system’s release, other than to say it will hit the street by early next year.

Microsoft did not immediately respond to questions about Vista SP2’s timetable.


Source: computerworld

Windows worm exploits Vista autoplay function

The Conficker virus, which had infected an estimated nine millions computers by Thursday is spreading at a rate of one million machines per day according to US software protection firm F-Secure.USB memory sticks infected with the virus trick users into installing the worm, according to researchers.

The “Autoplay” function, which searches for programs on removable drives and is part of Microsoft’s Windows Vista and early versions of Windows 7 platforms, is being exploited by the hackers.

The virus infiltrates this process and tricks users into believing it is a folder that can be opened. When a user clicks this bogus option, the worm installs and buries itself deep into the operating system.

Once there it attempts to contact a number of websites set up by the hackers. From there a further program could be downloaded that could takeover the infected machine.

Users are advised to install the latest security updates from Microsoft and have up-to-date anti-virus software installed.


Source: thenorthernecho

Sunday, January 25, 2009

What scares me about Windows 7

In a nutshell, I think it's a great operating system that could become my favorite of all time with more updates and proper development.

But that doesn't mean I don't have reservations. There are still some lingering issues that Microsoft hasn't addressed.

Is Windows 7 designed to be just the next iteration in a long line of Microsoft operating systems or does Microsoft want it to be something different, something new? Answering that question isn't as easy as I once thought. The look and feel of Windows 7 is great. It reminds me more of a Mac than any previous version of Windows. I like that, but especially for Windows XP users who have never switched to any other operating system, that's not necessarily good.

Is it a Mac or is it Windows?

As a Mac user, I like the Dock, enjoy Mac OS X's user interface, and typically appreciate its design. After using Windows 7, I have the same feeling. Windows 7 is easily the most attractive OS Microsoft has ever released and its revamped Taskbar is a treat to use, thanks to snazzy thumbnail features that actually put Apple's Dock to shame.

But after using Windows 7 for a while, it quickly became apparent that in Microsoft's quest to make Windows "prettier," it sometimes makes it harder to perform basic functions. The same Windows you're familiar with is still there, it's just harder to find under all the makeup. Especially if you're an XP user who skipped Vista.

On more than one occasion, I clicked on an open application in the Taskbar expecting another window to open (after all, this is Windows). But just like the Mac, it didn't happen. Instead, Windows 7 highlighted that app and brought the window to the front. To open another window, I was forced to right-click the icon and click another option. For the veteran Mac user, that's expected. For the veteran Windows user, that's something new that will take some getting used to.

That's just one example of many that I found in Windows 7. A slight glare in the upper corner of an icon indicates a program is running. After a while, you'll get used to that. But for someone who has used every other version of Windows and isn't as tech-savvy as some, that will undoubtedly be confusing at first.

I'm afraid Microsoft has placed too much stock in Apple's design and not enough in usability. That's appealing for Mac users, but if I had never touched an Apple machine, I don't think I'd want my Windows box to be a Mac clone. I'd want it to be Windows. I'd get over it. It would just take some time.

Security

Windows 7 has the same basic security features as Vista, which does make it more secure than most previous iterations of Windows, and I'm definitely heartened by the operating system's "Action Center," which tries to make it easier for users to secure their computers. But security is still a major issue with the OS.

According to a report last year, the security company PC Tools found 639 unique threats over the first six months of 2008 for every 1,000 machines running Vista. That tally is actually better than XP, which was plagued with 1,021 issues. Ironically, Windows 2000 was safest, suffering 586 threats that penetrated the operating system's defenses.

But as CNET's Ina Fried reports, as far as Windows 7's security goes, "it appears to draw heavily from the investments the company made with Windows Vista."

"The most notable change," Fried writes, "is probably the fact that users now have the option to choose how often they are required to authorize changes to their system. One of the most frequent criticisms of Vista was the annoyance of the User Account Control dialog boxes that forced users to authenticate many types of changes to their systems."

In other words, Windows 7 is about as secure as Windows Vista, which was plagued by 639 threats over a six-month period. That's an improvement over previous iterations of the software, so sticking to XP probably isn't advised if security is a major concern, but let's face it--that track record isn't ideal.